IIPM v. Bloggers Part II

Continuing with the IIPM vs Bloggers debate, I was surfing www.iipm.edu to know more about the institute when i, just for the sake of curiosity perused their disclaimer page.(You can find it here http://www.iipm.edu/disclaimer.html). I present below an excerpt from that page : "IIPM is not responsible for the contents put on any of its own web sites by the web master. None of the information provided on the web site may be held against or for IIPM."

Make your own opinion on that one, but i personally think thats shady. Now can somebody who is legally erudite tell me if thats a standard disclaimer? Brilliant if it is, cos then rashmi and gaurav just need to add the same lines in their blogs saying information on their blog cant be held against them and they will be in the clear. That line of reasoning was purely for argument's sakes and I would much rather that the war was fought in the open and not over a cup of tea on some cosy corner table.

P.S: Read the entire disclaimer at the url provided lest i be accused of thrusting that excerpt above out of context. And in case they do change their webpage before you can get to it, not to worry. I have that covered.